Towards a multidimensional biodiversity index for national application

  • 1.

    Summary for policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES Secretariat, 2019).

  • 2.

    Measuring progress: towards achieving the environmental dimension of the SDGs (UNEP, 2019).

  • 3.

    Blicharska, M. et al. Contributions of biodiversity to sustainable development. Nat. To support 2, 1083-1093 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 4.

    The Global Risks Report 2020 (World Economic Forum, 2020).

  • 5.

    Diaz, S. et al. The widespread human-induced decline of life on Earth underscores the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Dasgupta, P. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review (Trésor HM, 2021).

  • 7.

    Pascual, U. et al. Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nat. To support. 4, 567-572 (2021).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Land degradation and restoration assessment report (IPBES Secretariat, 2018).

  • 9.

    UNEP Borders Report 2016: Emerging Issues of Concern for the Environment (UNEP, 2016).

  • ten.

    Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Pandemics (IPBES Secretariat, 2020).

  • 11.

    Tittensor, DP et al. A mid-term review of progress towards international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241-244 (2014).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Global Biodiversity Outlook Flight. 25 (CBD Secretariat, 2014).

  • 13.

    Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond planetary boundaries? A global assessment. Science 353, 288-291 (2016).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Butchart, SHM et al. Red List Index Improvements. PLoS A 2, e140 (2007).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 15.

    McRae, L., Deinet, S. & Freeman, R. The Diversity Weighted Living Planets Index: Controlling Taxonomic Bias in a Global Biodiversity Indicator. PLoS A 12, e0169156 (2017).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Pascual, U. et al. Valuing the contributions of nature to people: the IPBES approach. Court. Opinion. About. To support. 26–27, 7-16 (2017).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Human Development Report 2020: The Next Frontier — Human Development and the Anthropocene (UNDP, 2020).

  • 18.

    Global Multidimensional Poverty Index 2020 – Charting Pathways Out of Multidimensional Poverty (UNDP & OPHI, 2020).

  • 19.

    Becker, FG et al. Global Slavery Index 2018 (Walk Free Foundation, 2018).

  • 20.

    ITUC Global Rights Index 2020: world’s worst countries for workers (CSI, 2020).

  • 21.

    Corruption Perception Index 2020 (Transparency International, 2020).

  • 22.

    Soto-Navarro, CA et al. Building a Multidimensional Biodiversity Index – A Scorecard for Biodiversity Health (UNEP-WCMC, 2020); https://www.unep-wcmc.org/resources-and-data/building-a-multidimensional-biodiversity-index

  • 23.

    Stiglitz, JE, Fitoussi, J.-P. & Durand, M. Beyond GDP: Measuring What Matters for Economic and Social Performance (OECD, 2018).

  • 24.

    Van den Bergh, JCJM The GDP paradox. J. Econ. Psychol. 30, 117-135 (2009).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 25.

    UNDP Strategic Plan, 2018-2021 (UNDP, 2017).

  • 26.

    Dasgupta, P. Human well-being and the natural environment (Oxford Univ. Press, 2001).

    Delivered

    Google Scholar

  • 27.

    Costanza, R. et al. It’s time to put GDP behind. Nature 505, 283-285 (2014).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Raworth, K. Donut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st Century Economist (Random House, 2017).

  • 29.

    Mazzucato, M. The value of everything: creating and integrating the global economy (Penguin, 2019).

  • 30.

    Perrings, C. et al. Biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: saving natural capital without losing interest. Conserv. Biol. 20, 263-264 (2006).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 31.

    Primmer, E. & Paavola, J. Ecosystem insurance value: an introduction. School. Econ. 184, 107001 (2021).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 32.

    Jørgensen, SL, Termansen, M. & Pascual, U. Natural insurance as a condition of market insurance: adaptation to climate change in agriculture. School. Econ. 169, 106489 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 33.

    UNEP / CBD / COP / DEC / X / 2 Strategic Plan for Biodiversity (2011-2020) and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets (CBD, 2010).

  • 34.

    Hansen, MH, Li, H. & Svarverud, R. Ecological civilization: interpreting the Chinese past, projecting the global future. Glob. About. Switch 53, 195-203 (2018).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 35.

    Gruetzmacher, K. et al. The Berlin One Health Principles: Bridging Global Health and Conservation. Sci. About. 764, 142919 (2021).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 36.

    IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In Special report on Global warming of 1.5 ° C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (OMM, 2018).

  • 37.

    2019 — Global Report on Food Crises: Joint Analysis for Better Decisions (Food Security Information Network, 2019).

  • 38.

    CBD / WG2020 / 2/4 29 Report of the Open-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework on its second meeting (CBD, 2020).

  • 39.

    Cardinale, BJ et al. The loss of biodiversity and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59-67 (2012).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 40.

    Chan, KMA et al. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values ​​and the environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 113, 1462-1465 (2016).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 41.

    Chan, KMA, Gould, RK & Pascual, U. Editorial overview: relationship values: what are they and what are we talking about? Court. Opinion. About. To support. 35, A1 – A7 (2018).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 42.

    Diaz, S. et al. Evaluate nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270-272 (2018).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 43.

    Convention on Biological Diversity (United Nations, 1992).

  • 44.

    Mace, GM et al. Aim higher to curve the biodiversity loss curve. Nat. To support 1, 448-451 (2018).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Pereira, HM et al. Essential variables of biodiversity. Science 339, 277-278 (2013).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 46.

    Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Global modeling of nature’s contributions to humans. Science 366, 255-258 (2019).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 47.

    Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M. & Torrisi, G. On the methodological framework of composite indices: a review of the issues of weighting, aggregation and robustness. Soc. Indic. Res. 141, 61-94 (2019).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 48.

    Manual on Construction of Composite Indicators – Methodology and User Guide (OECD, 2008).

  • 49.

    Kumar, P. (ed.) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations (Earthscan, 2010).

  • 50.

    Folke, C., Biggs, R., Norström, AV, Reyers, B. & Rockström, J. Socio-ecological resilience and the science of biosphere-based sustainability. School. Soc. 21, 41 (2016).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 51.

    The Global Sustainable Development Goals (Global Goals); http://www.globalgoals.org/resources

  • 52.

    Zenghelis, D. et al. Valuing wealth, building prosperity: LetterOne Wealth Economy Project Year One Report (Bennett Institute for Public Policy, 2020).

  • 53.

    Halpern, BS et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615-620 (2012).

    CASE
    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 54.

    Wendling, ZA et al. 2020 Environmental performance index (Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, 2020).

  • 55.

    Borucke, M. et al. Taking into account the demand and supply of the regenerative capacity of the biosphere: the methodology and the underlying framework of the national footprint accounts. School. Indic. 24, 518-533 (2013).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 56.

    Sachs, J. et al. The Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: Sustainable Development Report 2020 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  • 57.

    Usubiago-Liano, A. & Ekins, P. Developing a New Strong Environmental Sustainability Index: Preliminary Results (Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, 2019).

  • 58.

    Acosta, LA et al. Green Growth Index 2020 – Measuring performance in achieving SDG targets Technical Report No.16 (GGGI, 2020).

  • 59.

    2019 Agrobiodiversity Index Report: Risk and resilience (International Biodiversity, 2019).

  • 60.

    Angulo, R., Díaz, Y. & Pardo, R. The Colombian Multidimensional Poverty Index: Measuring Poverty in a Public Policy Context. Soc. Indic. Res. 127, 1–38 (2016).

    Item

    Google Scholar

  • 61.

    Watts, K. et al. Ecological shifts and the path to conservation success. Nat. School. Evol. 4, 304-311 (2020).

    Item

    Google Scholar


  • Source link

    Comments are closed.